<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="W05-0311">
  <Title>The Reliability of Anaphoric Annotation, Reconsidered: Taking Ambiguity into Account</Title>
  <Section position="1" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="abstr">
    <SectionTitle>
Abstract
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> We report the results of a study of the reliability of anaphoric annotation which (i) involved a substantial number of naive subjects, (ii) used Krippendorff's a instead of K to measure agreement, as recently proposed by Passonneau, and (iii) allowed annotators to mark anaphoric expressions as ambiguous.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>