<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="M91-1011">
  <Title>26 MAY KIDNAPPING TERRORIST ACT &amp;quot;COLOMBIAN ARMY OF NATIONAL LIBERATION&amp;quot; ARMY OF NATIONAL LIBERATION REPORTED AS FACT*</Title>
  <Section position="9" start_page="90" end_page="90" type="ackno">
    <SectionTitle>
LESSONS LEARNED
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> Since we have performed several MUC-like tasks (i.e., data extraction) as described in the system summary , as well as evaluations, the main lesson learned was not to postpone further the acquisition of an on-line dictionary such as Longmans or the OED . In any case, had we made such an acquisition for MUC-3, time an d resources would have been insufficient to integrate it with the other system components and exploit it within th e MUC-3 context.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> With respect to evaluation, the evaluations performed by LSI on the systems described in [2] and [3] bot h included competitive testing in the template-filling task against a human user or simulated user of the type o f information in the given domain. This type of evaluation is perhaps more difficult in the MUC case, but, base d on our experience, is extremely significant for users, because it is more believable to them than a series of finely tuned scores .</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>