<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="W04-0311">
  <Title>Dynamic Dependency Parsing</Title>
  <Section position="8" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
9 Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> Incremental parsing using weighted constraint optimization has been classi ed as a special case of dynamic dependency parsing.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> The idea of nonspec dependency edges has been described as a means of expressing expectations during the incremental process. We have argued that (a) nonspec dependency edges are more adequate to model pre x-analyses and (b) o er a computational advantage compared to a parser that models the special situation of a sentence pre x only by means of violated constraints. null While completing the notion of dynamic dependency parsing, we assessed the consequences of an incremental parsing mode to the most commonly used optimization methods used in WCDG.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="2"> Further research will need to add the notion of DynCSP to the WCDG system as well as an adaption and completion of an existing constraint grammar. This will allow an in-depth evaluation of dynamic dependency parsing with and without nonspec dependency edges given the optimization methods currently available.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="3"> Experiments will be conducted to acquire parsing times per increment that are then compared to human reading times.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>