<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="W04-1810">
  <Title>Quantitative Portraits of Lexical Elements</Title>
  <Section position="6" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
5 Conclusions
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> We have shown that different term weighting measures have different spheres of interpretation; on the basis of that we have illustrated that the combination of these can illustrates complex aspects of lexical nature. Though it can be argued that the present study does not show ways for applications nor &amp;quot;empirical&amp;quot; evaluations within applications, we believe that &amp;quot;empirical&amp;quot; evaluations should be properly founded by the framework of interpretation in order for the results to be generalised in a scientific 2This is in accordance with the observation by Hisamitsu et al. (2000) which says that the measure of term representativeness is particularly useful to exclude general elements. way; history of sciences have shown that often reliance on &amp;quot;empirical&amp;quot; evaluations correlates with the lack of theory or scientific wholesomeness.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>