<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="P06-1021">
  <Title>PCFGs with Syntactic and Prosodic Indicators of Speech Repairs</Title>
  <Section position="9" start_page="166" end_page="166" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
7 Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> Conventional PCFGs can improve their detection of speech repairs by incorporating Lickley's hypothesis about interrupted prosody and by implementing Levelt's well-formedness rule. These benefits are additive.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> The strengths of these simple tree-based techniques should be combinable with sophisticated string-based (Johnson and Charniak, 2004; Liu, 2004; Zhang and Weng, 2005) approaches by applying the methods of Wieling et al. (2005) for constraining parses by externally-suggested brackets.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>