File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/concl/06/w06-1512_concl.xml
Size: 2,102 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 13:55:36
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="W06-1512"> <Title>Semantic Interpretation of Unrealized Syntactic Material in LTAG</Title> <Section position="9" start_page="95" end_page="95" type="concl"> <SectionTitle> 7 Antecedent Contained Deletion(ACD) </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> Further evidence for the proposed analysis comes from sentences with ACD, discussed in Sag 1980, Egg and Erk 2001, Asher et al 2001, Jacobson (to appear), and illustrated in (13): (13) John wants Mary to read every book Bill does.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="1"> The elided material in this sentence is understood as either &quot;Bill reads&quot; or &quot;Bill wants Mary to read&quot;. Given that 'want' and 'every' can take different scope, four possible readings are expected. However, puzzling in this case is the unavailability of one of these readings: *John wants that for every book that Bill wants Mary to read, she reads it. Let us consider the final interpretation of this sentence: The non-lexicalized S tree introduces a proposition l3 and variables C and v3. These variables can be unified with either S features of the 'read'-tree (i.e. C1 and v), or S features of the 'want'-tree (i.e. C2 and v0). In the first case, the small ellipsis interpretation is derived, and both scope readings are available: C = C1, v3 = v</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="3"> If C and v3 are unified with S features of the 'want'-tree, then the large ellipsis interpretation</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="5"> l0: want(r, read(x, y)), l3: want(z, read(x, y)) The reading where every >> want is derived by the following constraints: N5-> l0, C1-> l1, R5 ->l8 l5: every(y, book(y) & want(z, read(x,y)), want(r, read(x, y)) l3 The fourth possible reading, where want >> every, however, is predicted to be unavailable under the present assumptions. This reading, want(r, every(y, book(y) & want(z, read(x, y)), read(x, y)), cannot be derived, since it requires the proposition l3 to be 'inserted' within the proposition l0.</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>