File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/concl/90/c90-2028_concl.xml
Size: 1,102 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 13:56:29
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="C90-2028"> <Title>Reading Distinction in MT*</Title> <Section position="6" start_page="165" end_page="165" type="concl"> <SectionTitle> 5 Conclusion </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> In this paper, I developed tests to answer the question whether an lu with two senses is to be analyzed as ambiguous or vague with respect to them from the semantic conjecture (2). The tests allow for theoretically well-founded and consistent decisions in many cases. In MT, they determine a proper balance on the cline between what can easily be disambiguated monolingually, and what is useful as a distinction in translation. As such they define the target for monolingual disambiguation, and the class of bilingual ambiguities, that should be treated in transfer. Since the MT environment has only been used in the argumentation, not in the solution proposed, theoretical well-foundedness and consistency evolving from the tests presented here are equally valid in other environments where a monolingual dictionary is used.</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>