<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="M91-1025">
  <Title>ITP : DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERPRETEXT SYSTE M AS USED FOR MUC-3</Title>
  <Section position="2" start_page="169" end_page="169" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> The Naive Semantic lexicon and all of its feature types, the Sentential Formal Semantic modul e and the Discourse Semantic module were all brought to bear on the MUC-3 task without change (except addition of vocabulary) . This means that ITP's deep natural language approach prove d useful for a very difficult task . Given that the parser only returned half of the sentences in the messages, the 1TP Natural Language Understanding Module and the Template Reasoning Module performed very well . The MUC-3 task uncovered bugs in the NLU Module, some of which were fixed for MUC-3, others not. ITP expects far better performance with our new parser and bug free code.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>