<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="C94-1087">
  <Title>APPENDIX: Running Examples Lexicon Verbal Lexicon Ending Lexicon Postposition Lexicon Dthers</Title>
  <Section position="6" start_page="537" end_page="537" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
CONCLUSION
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> We have shown that the two-level morphology model, which has bccn claimed to be inappropriate for Korean, can be successfully applied to Korean. That is, we have implemented a successful two-level morphology system for Korean (see APPENDIX). This system was ba~cd on PC-KIMMO which is a shareware. Itowever, we modified the I/O component of PC-KIMMO to handle Korean alphabet HANGUL; we have constructed a Korean dictionary for the PC-KIMMO, which contains about 12,000 entries; we represented a Korean morphotactics for the PC-KIMMO, which indicates the morphological structures of known words; we wrote 52 two-level spelling rules for the PG-KIMMO, which rccovcr almost all spelling alternations in Korean morphology.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> Our two-level system has been experimented with 2,172 randomly words selected from Korean textbooks (413,975 words) for elementary education. For this test set, the system produces the correct outputs although it includes about 5% extra incorrect analyses (i.e., overgeneration). IIcre the overgeneration is ascribed to the fact that it results from the weak expressive power of morphotactic information in PCKIMMO. null</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>