File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/evalu/06/w06-1315_evalu.xml
Size: 1,081 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 13:59:52
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="W06-1315"> <Title>Sydney, July 2006. c(c)2006 Association for Computational Linguistics Empirical Verification of Adjacency Pairs Using Dialogue Segmentation</Title> <Section position="9" start_page="105" end_page="105" type="evalu"> <SectionTitle> 5 Results for kh </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> Here are the 25 pairs with the highest kh scores.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="1"> With tail probability p = .0001, a kh normalises the list; low-frequency acts like REJECT and EXPLAINED_REJECT now appear as a part of their respective pairs. These results give empirical justification for Sacks and Schegloff's adjacency pairs, and reveals more not mentioned elsewhere in the literature, such as DEFER:ACCEPT. As such, it gives a good idea of what kinds of speech acts are expected within a chunk.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="2"> In addition, these results can be plotted into a directed acyclic graph (seen in Figure 1). This graph can be used as a sort of conversational map.</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>