<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="P98-2232">
  <Title>Combination of an Automatic and an Interactive Disambiguation Method</Title>
  <Section position="6" start_page="1424" end_page="1424" type="evalu">
    <SectionTitle>
6 Discussion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"/>
    <Section position="1" start_page="1424" end_page="1424" type="sub_section">
      <SectionTitle>
6.1 The Accuracy of Disambiguation
</SectionTitle>
      <Paragraph position="0"> The effect of the proposed method on tile accuracy is expressed by the difference of distributions of two lnarks, '+' and '*' in Figure 5. This shows that the accuracy of the proposed method is better t.hall that of MA in ally property of tree. Table 1 (the line of &amp;quot;Accuracy') shows the minimum, maxinmln, and average values of the ratio of ilnproved accuracy (RIA).</Paragraph>
      <Paragraph position="1"> The definition of RIA is shown as follows:</Paragraph>
      <Paragraph position="3"> where acp, ac a is t.he accuracy the result by MP and MA respectively.</Paragraph>
    </Section>
    <Section position="2" start_page="1424" end_page="1424" type="sub_section">
      <SectionTitle>
6.2 The Number of Interaction
</SectionTitle>
      <Paragraph position="0"> Tile number of interaction may increase on the condition that the accuracy of the analyzed result is maxinfized. Ill this section, the degree of the increase will be estimated by comparing the number of interaction of MP with that of MA. For this purpose, 'RII' is defined as follows: RII -np - na nw where np, na is the number of interaction by MP and MA respectively, 71.,,, is the llumber of ambiguous words in an input sentence. RII represents the ratio of the increase ill the number of interaction per ambiguous word. Table l(the lille of 'Interaction') shows the rnininaum, lnaximuna, and average of RII. To reduce the number of interaction, the automatte disambiguation is executed instead of executing tile interactive disambiguation, estimating the loss of the accuracy L(i) ill node i. L(i) is defined as follows:</Paragraph>
      <Paragraph position="2"> The proposed lnethod will allow the system to reduce the nunfi)er of interaction, by considering L(i) ill each node.</Paragraph>
    </Section>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>