<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="M91-1011">
  <Title>26 MAY KIDNAPPING TERRORIST ACT &amp;quot;COLOMBIAN ARMY OF NATIONAL LIBERATION&amp;quot; ARMY OF NATIONAL LIBERATION REPORTED AS FACT*</Title>
  <Section position="3" start_page="85" end_page="86" type="intro">
    <SectionTitle>
SLOT
REC PRE OVG FAL
MATCHED ONLY
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> since our earlier system of categories and features had to be substantially revised and enhanced to provide all the subcategorization and selection information required by the GB parser. The remaining 10% of the effort was devoted to the higher level components for semantic and pragmatic interpretation at the sentence and messag e level (i.e., the functional parse, (DBG) template generation and frames component, and back-end applicatio n component for extracting data for filling MUC-3 templates .</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> Since December, approximately 10,000 new lines of commented Prolog code have been written, and are in the process of being debugged. The lexicon developed for MUC-3 comprised almost 10,000 entries includin g inflected forms. In comparison, the unclassified lexicon for the air activities messages recently completed fo r Rome Laboratory [3] included only about 1500 entries, and the most recent lexicon for the Army maneuver dialogs is estimated at about 3,000 entries . The MUC-3 frames component includes 3485 frames and 257 classe s of items. However, much of this information was not exploited properly since, as mentioned above, very littl e of the MUC-3 development effort could be devoted to the higher level DBG components which utilize fram e and slot information.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>