<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="C90-2010">
  <Title>I Icad Pbrasc V S, VI' N NP Prcp pp</Title>
  <Section position="5" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="metho">
    <SectionTitle>
1. Declarative
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> &amp;quot;II~e lexical information defines legal sentences or phrase. And the changes in the above information does not affect processing procedures and results.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
  <Section position="6" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="metho">
    <SectionTitle>
2. Algorithm-free
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> Different control processes are allowed for parsing or generation. Regardless of whether it is sequential, parallel, or heuristic control, the result will be the same.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
  <Section position="7" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="metho">
    <SectionTitle>
3. Suitable for parallel processing
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> The processes are head driven. Each possible head can initiate a phrasal construction process. Thus, processes can be executed in parallel.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> 4. Allows a partial parse At any moment of the unification processes, the accumulated information shows the partial result up to that momem even if the input is ungrammatical.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="2"> 5. Semantic structure is universal The semantic information contained in the feature structures of each lexical entry is universal. Different languages differ with regard to syntactic of information. 6. Incorporated with thenmtic role identification schen~e The parametrical information for identifying thematic roles can bo encoded in ICG such that syntactic parsing and semantic analysis can be done in parallel.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="3"> 7. Parsing result is a thematic structure Recent theoretical linguistic studies are concerned with the relationship between thematic structures and argument structures (e.g. Brensan and Kanerva 1989).</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="4"> Our formalism directly and explicitly represents thematic structures.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="5"> Last but not least, we expect future studies of ICG to confirm tile plausibility of the following advantages.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
  <Section position="8" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="metho">
    <SectionTitle>
1. Efficient parsing
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> ICG has the advantages of lexicon-based parsing which is better focused on the relavant syntactic and semantic information.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
  <Section position="9" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="metho">
    <SectionTitle>
2. Cognitive reality
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> The language capability of a man seems to be improved day after day by learning and polishing lexical information. ICG is able to reflect this phenomenon.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> 58 5 3. Germration power ICG provides a way of generating surface seIlteilces froili thematic structures. The pragmatic consideration of the selection of the sentence patterns can be accomplished by incorporating the pragmatic features in the basic patterns and lexical rules.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>