File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/relat/95/p95-1001_relat.xml
Size: 1,750 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 14:16:05
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="P95-1001"> <Title>Learning Phonological Rule Probabilities from Speech Corpora with Exploratory Computational Phonology</Title> <Section position="8" start_page="4" end_page="6" type="relat"> <SectionTitle> 4 Related Work </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> Our algorithm for phonological rule probability estimation synthesizes and extends earlier work by (Cohen 1989) and (Wooters 1993). The idea of using optional phonological rules to construct a speech-recognition lexicon derives from Cohen (1989), who applied optional phonological rules to a baseform dictionary to produce a surface lexicon and then used TIMIT to assign probabilities for each pronunciation. The use of a forced-Viterbi speech decoder to discover pronunciations from a corpus was proposed by Wooters (1993). Weseniek & Sehiel (1994) independently propose a very similar forced-Viterbidecoder-based technique which they use for measuring the accuracy of hand-written phonology.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="1"> Chen (1990) and Riley (1991) model the relationship between phonemes and their Mlophonic realizations by training decision trees on TIMIT data. A decision tree is learned for each underlying phoneme specifying its .surface realization in different contexts. These completely automatic techniques, requiring no hand-written rules, can allow a more fine-grained analysis than our rule-based algorithm.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="2"> However, as a consequence, it is more difficult to extract generalizations across classes of phonemes to which rules can apply. We think that a hybrid between a rule-based and a decision-tree approach could prove quite powerful.</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>